HOLDING EMPLOYEE DIPLOMAS: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS AND WORKERS' RIGHTS CONCERNS

Authors

  • Didiek Wahju Indarta Universitas Bojonegoro
  • Lailatul Mutmainah Universitas Bojonegoro
  • Cindy Swastika Rahmania Universitas Bojonegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v8i1.9056

Keywords:

Policy, Holding Diploma, Workers' Rights, Employment, Violation of the Law.

Abstract

The detention of diplomas is carried out under the pretext that employees do not resign before the contract period ends. However, this action raises legal problems because it has the potential to violate the basic rights of workers, especially the right to private property and freedom of work. This is because every individual has the constitutional right to maintain ownership of the assets he or she legally acquires, including the results of work or income that are part of his or her personal property. If the policies or actions of the company, the government, or other parties limit or even confiscate part of the property without a clear and fair legal basis, then this can be considered a violation of the principle of non-deprivation of property without due process. This study aims to examine the practice of diploma retention from the perspective of employment law based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, as well as examine its legal implications for companies and workers. The research method used is normative juridical, with a legislative approach. The results of the study show that there is no strict provision in Law Number 13 of 2003 that allows the retention of diplomas by companies. On the contrary, the practice is contrary to the principle of protection of workers' rights regulated in the law and contrary to the principles of legal certainty and justice. Workers have the right to be actively involved in the process of drafting employment agreements through joint deliberation with employers, as stipulated in Article 52 of the Manpower Law. Diploma detention can be categorized as a form of violation of the law and the company can be subject to administrative or criminal sanctions if proven to be detrimental to workers. To overcome this, stronger and integrated law enforcement mechanisms are also needed, such as increasing the capacity and authority of labor supervisors, the establishment of special units to deal with violations of workers' rights, and the application of strict administrative and criminal sanctions against violating companies.

References

Adisti, Putu Cantika, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Udayana. “PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU†12, no. 03 (2024): 658–68.

ADITYA, RIZKY NAAFI, and TINA MARLINA. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Yang Ijazah Nya Dijadikan Jaminan Oleh Perusahaan Pemberi Kerja (Studi Penelitian Di Disnaker Kota Cirebon).†Hukum Responsif 11, no. 1 (2020): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v11i1.5022.

———. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Yang Ijazah Nya Dijadikan Jaminan Oleh Perusahaan Pemberi Kerja (Studi Penelitian Di Disnaker Kota Cirebon).†Hukum Responsif 11, no. 1 (2020): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v11i1.5022.

Akbar, Reynaldi Febrian. “Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Terhadap Pekerja / Buruh Yang Melakukan Kelalaian Kerja†2, no. 8 (2024): 1001–14.

ANANDA MUHAMAD TRI UTAMA. “TINJAUAN TENTANG PENAHANAN IJAZAH PEKERJA OLEH PENGUSAHA PADA PT.GARUDA EKSPRESS NUSANTARA SEBAGAI JAMINAN KERJA†9 (2022): 356–63.

ANNAS, SAIFUL. “TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENAHANAN IJAZAH SEBAGAI SYARAT KERJA MENURUT KUHPERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 (STUDY DI CV. MATRIX CAKRA NEGARA).†Αγαη 15, no. 1 (2024): 37–48.

Azhar, Muhamad, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Pelanggaran Hak Tenaga Kerja Melalui Penahanan Ijazah Sebagai Jaminan.†Law, Development and Justice Review 2, no. 2 (2019): 361–73. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i2.6453.

Fiboda, Engku, Eduardus E S Kusuma, Firdi Hardana, and Asmak Ul. “Jurnal Rectum PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI TENAGA KERJA DALAM HUKUM.†JURNAL TEKNOLOGI INDUSTRI, no. 13 (2024): 247–54.

———. “Jurnal Rectum PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI TENAGA KERJA DALAM HUKUM.†JURNAL TEKNOLOGI INDUSTRI, no. 13 (2024): 247–54.

Fuad, and Ontran Sumantri Riyanto. “PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP PENAHANAN IJAZAH ASLI DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA OLEH PERUSAHAAN.†Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 2, no. 1 (September 2023): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v2i1.18.

Harahap, Nurhotia. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Pekerja Dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan.†Jurnal Al-Maqasid 6, no. 1 (2020): 16.

Hidayat, Mochamad Rifki. “Kepastian Hukum Pemenuhan Upah Karyawan Dalam Pembagian Harta Pailit.†Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2021): 155–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.873.

I Made Chossy Narayanan, and I Wayan Novy Purwanto. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hubungan Kerja Tindakan Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja Oleh Perusahaan Berdasar Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan.†JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 2, no. 4 (July 2023): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i4.2310.

J. Sahetapy, Agustinus. “Pelaksanaan Kontrak Kerja Antara Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan (Studi Pada PT. Wahana Kencana Mineral (WKM) Halmahera Timur).†Jurnal Sains, Sosial Dan Humaniora (Jssh) 1, no. 2 (2022): 107–11. https://doi.org/10.52046/jssh.v1i2.1411.

Jaya, Wayan Ardi Indra, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. “Akibat Hukum Penahanan Ijazah Oleh Badan Usaha Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian.†Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 2, no. 3 (November 2021): 656–61. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4170.656-661.

Mambu, Joupy G.Z. “ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA WANITA (Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor. 13 Tahun 2003).†De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 2, no. 2 (2010). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v2i2.2975.

Perusahaan Atas Perbuatan, Tanggungjawab, Tanggungjawab Perusahaan Atas Perbuatan Karyawan Yang Mengakibatkan, and Mhd Arief Akbar Surahman. “IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Kerugian Terhadap Orang Lain (Studi Putusan NO. 206/PDT/2014/PT.SBY)"†2, no. 3 (2021): 613–23.

Pratama, Dicky Satria, Muhammad Wendy Alpianur Ariady, Muhammad Zulfikar Azis, and Muhammad Zacky Umar Pananda. “Analisis Hukum Mengenai Penahanan Ijazah Karyawan Oleh Perusahaan.†Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 4 (June 2024): 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2628.

Putra, Ferdiansyah, and Muhamad Dicky putra Irsyam. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penahanan Ijazah Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Hubungan Kerja.†Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2020): 34–41.

Putri Nabila, Andita, and Gunawan Djayaputra. “Urgensi Pelaksanaan Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Merumuskan Perjanjian Guna Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Para Pihak.†UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4072–80. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1246.

Tarigan, Pagita. “Skripsi Pagita Dewi Tarigan 1806200321 (Hukum Pidana) (1),†2022.

Trixie, Ivana, Mikael Alvaro, Christopher Matthew, Heaven Mclaren, and Dinda Arista Putri. “Implementasi Hak Para Pekerja Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan (Analisis Kasus PT Livatech Elektronik Indonesia).†Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2023): 2000–2008.

Wibowo, Benedictus Satryo, Achmad Busro, and Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. “Legitimasi Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT).†Notarius 14, no. 2 (2021): 738–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43725.

Yuridis, Analisis, Penyerahan Ijazah, and Sebagai Jaminan. “DALAM MELAKUKAN HUBUNGAN KERJA†3, no. November (2024).

Zulkifli, Akhmad. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PRAKTEK PENAHANAN IJAZAH†12, no. 2337 (2024).

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

Issue

Section

Articles