RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: A NEW APPROACH TO RESOLVING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

M. Aaz Jidatul Haz* -  Pascasarjana UIN Mataram, Indonesia
Lalu Muhammad Nurul Wathoni -  Pascasarjana UIN Mataram, Indonesia
Zulkarnain Zulkarnain -  Pascasarjana UIN Mataram, Indonesia
Muhammad Maghfurrahman -  Pascasarjana UIN Mataram, Indonesia
Fathur Baldan Haramain -  Universitas Al-Azhar Cairo, Egypt

DOI : 10.30863/aldustur.v7i2.7399

Domestic Violence (a.k.a KDRT) has been identified as a form of crime that falls into the category of "hidden crime". Handling through the conventional criminal justice system often faces serious obstacles, especially because victims often experience deep trauma. In addition, when these cases are presented in court, the justice obtained is often unsatisfactory for both the perpetrator and the victim. As an alternative, the Restorative Justice approach emerged as an attempt to provide a more holistic solution. Restorative justice focuses on returning losses to victims, improving the perpetrator's behavior, and providing opportunities for perpetrators to reintegrate into society without experiencing stereotypes. In the Indonesian context, this research aims to explore more deeply the implementation of restorative justice, including its legal basis, procedures, and carry out analysis using the concept of legal pluralism proposed by Werner Menski. This research is normative juridical in nature, with data collection carried out through documentation studies and interviews. Research findings show that the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia is supported by a strong legal foundation. However, there are still obstacles in accommodating the three elements of legal pluralism proposed by Menski. In other words, even though restorative justice has been formally recognized, its implementation still needs to be improved to more effectively achieve the desired restorative goals.

Keywords
Restorative Justice; Domestic Violence; Criminal Justice
  1. Almubarok, Fauzi. “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Istighna 1, No. 2 (2018): 115–43.
  2. Amalia, Rizky, Hafrida Hafrida, And Elizabeth Siregar. “Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Malaysia.” Pampas: Journal Of Criminal Law 2, No. 2 (2021): 1–14. Https://Doi.Org/10.22437/Pampas.V2i2.13334.
  3. Anton, Purnomo. “Pelaksanaan Restoraticve Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Di Polres Pekalongan.” Dinamika Hukum 14, No. 2 (2023): 35–52.
  4. Brenner, Suzanne. “Private Moralities In The Public Sphere: Democratization, Islam, And Gender In Indonesia.” American Anthropologist 113, No. 3 (2011): 478–90. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1548-1433.2010.01355.X.
  5. Brumberg-Chaumont, Julie. “Universal Logic And Aristotelian Logic: Formality And Essence Of Logic.” Logica Universalis 9, No. 2 (2015): 253–78. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11787-015-0123-Y.
  6. Disantara, Fradhana Putra. “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia Sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 6, No. 1 (2021): 1–36. Https://Doi.Org/10.35673/Ajmpi.V6i1.1129.
  7. Edi, Nurcahyo, John Pieris, And Nelson Simanjuntak. “Analisa Hukum Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Upaya Mereformasi Sistem Peradilan Umum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika 4, No. 3 (2023): 1092–99.
  8. Ellion, Handry Argatama, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, And Bambang Sugiri. “The Basic Regulation Of Judicial Authority In Adjudicating Cases Based On Criminal Procedure.” International Journal Of Social Science And Economic Research 3, No. 06 (2018): 2503–18.
  9. Farrokhi, Mansour. “The Role Of Legal Translation In The Interpretation Of International Law Documents.” Russian Law Journal 7, No. 1 (2019): 55–86. Https://Doi.Org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-1-55-86.
  10. Fathurokhman, Ferry. “The Necessity Of Restorative Justice On Juvenile Delinquency In Indonesia, Lessons Learned From The Raju And Aal Cases.” Procedia Environmental Sciences 17 (2013): 967–75. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Proenv.2013.02.115.
  11. Fihra Rizqi Novia Ridwan, Dewi Asri Yustia. “Pentingnya Pendampingan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Kebutuhan Dan Keharusan Hukum Pidana.” Legal Standing 8, No. 2 (2024): 352–68. Https://Doi.Org/10.24269/Ls.V8i1.8545.
  12. Gultom, Pardomuan. “Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kemungkinan Dapat Diterapkannya Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah 3, No. 1 (2022): 417–45.
  13. Hanafi Arif, Amabarsari. “Penerapan Restorasi Justise Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Penerapan Restorasi Justise Dalam Hukum Pidana 53, No. 9 (2013): 1689–99.
  14. Huberman, Michael, Dan Matthew B. Miles. “The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion.” Sage Publications, 2002.
  15. Indrawan, D P, L Karjoko, And R Candrakirana. “… Keadilan Distributif Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Jalur Kereta Api Bandara Soekarno-Hatta: Universitas ….” Yustisi 11, No. 1 (2024): 81–93. Https://Ejournal.Uika-Bogor.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Yustisi/Article/View/16193.
  16. Irabiah, Irabiah, Beni Suswanto, And Muhammad Ali Alala Mafing. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Pada Tingkat Penuntutan (Studi Kasus Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kotamobagu).” Perspektif 27, No. 2 (2022): 131–38. Https://Doi.Org/10.30742/Perspektif.V27i2.828.
  17. Irianto, Sulistyowati. “Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Pluralisme Hukum Dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 33, No. 4 (2017): 485. Https://Doi.Org/10.21143/Jhp.Vol33.No4.1425.
  18. Kornelius Benuf, Muhammad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Jurnal Gema Keadilan 7, No. 1 (2020): 20–33. Https://Doi.Org/10.24246/Jrh.2019.V3.I2.P145-160.
  19. Leonardo, Pieter, And Hery Firmansyah. “Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, No. 8 (2023): 6090–6103. Https://Doi.Org/10.36418/Syntax-Literate.V8i8.13516.
  20. Lesmana, Csa Teddy, And Rida Ista Sitepu. “Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Penerapan Mediasi Penal Dan Restoratif Justice Kepada Anggota Penyidik Satreskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota.” Jurnal Abdi Nusa 2, No. 2 (2022): 49–59. Https://Doi.Org/10.52005/Abdinusa.V2i2.92.
  21. Manthovani, Reda, Rocky Marbun, Adnan Hamid, Andi Wahyu Wibisana, Cipta Indra, And Lestari Rachman. “The Practice Of Applying The Concept Of Restorative Justice In Law Enforcement In Indonesia.” Russian Law Journal Xi, No. 5 (2023): 5.
  22. Menski, Werner. Perbandingan Hukum Dalam Konteks Global : Sistem Eropa, Asia Dan Afrika. Nusa Media, 2008.
  23. Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Undip Press, 1996.
  24. Nazaruddin, Husni Djalil, M. Nur Rasyid. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian (Studi Kasus Di Polres Pidie).” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, No. 2 (2022): 145–62.
  25. Ness, V., And Daniel, W. “Restoring Justice: An Introduction To Restorative Justice.,” 2015.
  26. Pudjilianto, Belinda, And Emy Handayani. “Penerapan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Masyarakat.” Diponegoro Law Journal 11, No. 2 (2022): H. 344.
  27. Rif, Muhammad, And Muridah Isnawati. “Restorative Justice : Pemaknaan , Problematika , Dan Penerapan Yang Seyogianya.” Unes Journal Of Swara Justisia 8, No. 2 (2024): 276–89.
  28. Sarbini, Ilyas, Sukirman, And Aman Ma’arij. “Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.” Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 9, No. 1 (2020): 31–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.34304/Fundamental.V1i1.19.
  29. Sebayang, Artha, Utary Maharany Barus, And M. Citra Ramadhan. “Penyelesaian Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Melalui Restorative Justice Di Polda Sumut.” Journal Of Education, Humaniora And Social Sciences (Jehss) 4, No. 1 (2021): 450–59. Https://Doi.Org/10.34007/Jehss.V4i1.675.
  30. Setyowati, Dewi. “Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice Sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, No. 1 (2020): 121–41. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Pandecta.V15i1.24689.
  31. Sudiyana, Sudiyana, And Suswoto Suswoto. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum Dalam Mencari Keadilan Substantif.” Qistie 11, No. 1 (2018): 107–36. Https://Doi.Org/10.31942/Jqi.V11i1.2225.
  32. Wenzel, Michael, Tyler G. Okimoto, Norman T. Feather, And Michael J. Platow. “Retributive And Restorative Justice.” Law And Human Behavior 32, No. 5 (2008): 375–89. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10979-007-9116-6.
  33. Yani, Ramlah, And Hardianto Djanggih. “Efektivitas Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan.” Journal Of Lex Philosophy (Jlp) 4, No. 2 (2023): 2023.
  34. Yulia, Rena, And Aliyth Prakarsa. “Telaah Yuridis Terhadap Pengaturan Restorative Justice Di Kepolisian.” Wajah Hukum 5, No. 2 (2021): 562. Https://Doi.Org/10.33087/Wjh.V5i2.716.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-10-18
Published: 2024-12-08
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 96 40
In Vol 7, No 2 (2024)