Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) dalam Perspektif Psikologi Belajar Matematika

Raizal Rezky* -  SMP Negeri 1 Sampolawa. Buton Selatan, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/ekspose.v18i1.364

Abstrak

Matematika merupakan mata pelajaran yang dipelajari hampir ditiap jenjang pendidikan. Namun fakta yang terjadi di lapangan masih banyak siswa cenderung menganggap matematika sebagai pelajaran yang membosankan dan menakutkan karena penuh dengan angka dan rumus. Untuk itu pembelajaran matematika dilakukan dengan memperhatikan konsep akan menjadikan siswa belajar bermakna (meaningful learning). Konsep yang dipelajari disesuaikan dengan alur belajar yang dimiliki oleh siswa. Alur belajar atau hypothetical learning trajectory sendiri terdiri atas tiga aspek yaitu: (1) tujuan pembelajaran, (2) aktivitas belajar, (3) hipotesis belajar. Hipotesis belajar diperlukan guru guna mendesain pembelajaran yang akan sesuai dengan pola pemikiran siswa di kelas sesuai dengan karakteristik siswa.

Abstract

Mathematics was a subject that was studied in almost every level of education. But the facts that occur in the field are still many students tend to think of mathematics as a boring and scary lesson because it was full of numbers and formulas. For that mathematics learning was done by paying attention to the concept will make students learn meaningfully. The concepts learned were tailored to the learning flow that was owned by students. The learning flow or hypothetical learning trajectory itself consists of three aspects, i.e. (1) learning objectives, (2) learning activities, and (3) learning hypotheses. The learning hypothesis was needed by the teacher to design learning that would suit the thinking patterns of students in the class according to the characteristics of students.

Keywords
belajar bermakna; hipotesis alur belajar
  1. Amador, Julie, and Teruni Lamberg. “Learning Trajectories, Lesson Planning, Affordances, and Constraints in the Design and Enactment of Mathematics Teaching.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 15, no. 2 (2013): 146–70.
  2. Baharuddin, Baharuddin, and Esa Nur Wahyuni. “Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran.” Ar-Ruzz Media, 2008.
  3. Bakker, Arthur. Design Research in Statistics Education: On Symbolizing and Computer Tools. Amersfoort: Wilco Press, 2004.
  4. Clements, Douglas H, and Julie Sarama. Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Trajectories Approach. Routledge, 2014.
  5. ———. “Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 6, no. 2 (2004): 81–89.
  6. Empson, Susan B. “On the Idea of Learning Trajectories: Promises and Pitfalls.” The Mathematics Enthusiast 8, no. 3 (2011): 571–96.
  7. Kartianom, K, and Heri Retnawati. “Why Are Their Mathematical Learning Achievements Different? Re-Analysis Timss 2015 Data in Indonesia, Japan And Turkey.” International Journal on New Trends in Education & Their Implications (IJONTE) 9, no. 2 (2018).
  8. Kartianom, Kartianom. “Diagnosis Kesalahan Konsep Materi Matematika SMP Berdasarkan Hasil Ujian Nasional Di Kota Baubau.” UNY, 2017.
  9. Kartianom, Kartianom, and Djemari Mardapi. “The Utilization of Junior High School Mathematics National Examination Data: Conceptual Error Diagnosis.” REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education) 3, no. 2 (2018).
  10. Kartianom, Kartianom, and Oscar Ndayizeye. “What‘s Wrong with the Asian and African Students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement? The Multilevel PISA 2015 Data Analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika 4, no. 2 (2017): 200–210.
  11. Leonard, L, and Supardi US. “Pengaruh Konsep Diri, Sikap Siswa Pada Matematika, Dan Kecemasan Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika.” Cakrawala Pendidikan, no. 3 (2010): 341–52.
  12. Mayer, Richard E. The Promise of Educational Psychology: Learning in The Content Areas. Vol. 1. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
  13. NCTM. Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: Viginia, 2000.
  14. P Holt, Wilson, Sztajn Paola, and Edgington Cyndi. “Designing Professional Learning Tasks for Mathematics Learning Trajectories.” PNA 7, no. 4 (2013): 135–43.
  15. Rahma, N. “Belajar Bermakna Ausubel.” Al-Khawarizmi 1, no. 1 (2013): 43–48.
  16. Retnawati, Heri, Hasan Djidu, Ezi Apino, Kartianom Kartianom, and Risqa D Anazifa. “Teachers’ Knowledge about Higher-Oeder Thinking Skills and Its Learning Strategy.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76, no. 2 (2018).
  17. Rezky, R, and A Wijaya. “Designing Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Based on van Hiele Theory: A Case of Geometry.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097:12129. IOP Publishing, 2018.
  18. Simon, Martin A, and Ron Tzur. “Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 6, no. 2 (2004): 91–104.
  19. Skemp, Richard R. The Psychology of Learning Mathematics: Expanded American Edition. Routledge, 2012.
  20. Slavin, Robert E. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, Andpractice. London: Allyn and Bacon, 2006.
  21. Wijaya, A. “Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Dan Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Pengukuran Panjang [Hypothetical Learning Trajectory and Improvement of Length Measurement Concept].” In Seminar Nasional Matematika. Yogyakarta, 2009.
  22. Wilson, P Holt, Gemma F Mojica, and Jere Confrey. “Learning Trajectories in Teacher Education: Supporting Teachers’ Understandings of Students’ Mathematical Thinking.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 32, no. 2 (2013): 103–21.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-07-24
Published: 2019-07-24
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 3409 1936