HUBUNGAN SEKSUAL SUAMI ISTRI SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAH MURSALAH

Authors

  • Nur Afifah. HS Pascasarjana IAIN Bone, Indonesia
  • Muljan muljan Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone., Indonesia
  • Dewi Arnita Sari Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone., Indonesia
  • A. Very Febriany Pascasarjana IAIN Bone, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v7i2.10659

Keywords:

Maslahah Mursalah, Judge, Divorce Suit, Marital Relation, gender equality

Abstract

The phenomenon of increasing divorce cases in Indonesia shows that women are becoming more legally aware, but at the same time they still face structural barriers in the religious court process. One example of this can be seen in Decision Number 10/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Wtp at the Watampone Religious Court, where the judge dismissed the divorce petition because the parties were still in a marital relationship after the petition was filed. This study aims to analyze the basis of the judge's considerations in this case from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. The results of the study show that the judge applied the principle of dar'u al-mafasid muqaddam 'alā jalb al-maşālih by rejecting the lawsuit (Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard). The aim was to preserve hifz al-nasl (lineage) and prevent harm in the form of uncertainty regarding the legal status of children, as well as to preserve the integrity of the household. Normatively, this decision upholds the maqasid syariah (objectives of Sharia law). However, in practice, the interpretation of maslahah mursalah must be refined by increasing gender sensitivity and considering al-maslahah al-fardiyyah (individual interests) to achieve substantive justice

References

Al-Daghistani, Sami. “Handbook of Ethics of Islamic Economics and Finance, Edited by Abbas Mirakhor, Zamir Iqbal and Seyed Kazem Sadr.” Journal of Islamic Ethics 6, no. 2 (2022): 329–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340081.

———. “Handbook of Ethics of Islamic Economics and Finance, Edited by Abbas Mirakhor, Zamir Iqbal and Seyed Kazem Sadr.” Journal of Islamic Ethics 6, no. 2 (2022): 329–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340081.

Belanda, Pemerintah Hindia. “Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (H.I.R.) / Reglemen Indonesia Yang Diperbaharui.” Hindia Belanda: —, 1926. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38411/hir.

Faridah, Firyal Hana, Abdul Waid, and Muhammad Achid Nurseha. “ANALISIS YURIDIS DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM MENGENAI TIDAK DITERIMANYA ( NO ) GUGATAN CERAI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA” 1 (2023): 64–75.

Fitriyani, Fitriyani, Asep Saepudin Jahar, Zaitunah Subhan, and Rosdiana Rosdiana. “The Judges’ Legal Consideration on Divorce of Nushūz Cases at the Kupang High Religious Court: Gender Perspective.” Samarah 7, no. 3 (2023): 1971–89. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V7I3.14425.

Hasri, Muammar, Erzi Aurelia Maharani, dan Mustafa M.h. “MEMAKNAI PRIBAHASA BUGIS “MAKKALU DAPURENG WEKKA PITU†DALAM HUKUM ISLAM.” AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan 7, no. 1 (2025): 101–13. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v7i1.8495.

Handayani, Weely Septia Angger. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Cerai Gugat Ditinggal Suami (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Wonogiri Jawa Tengah 2014).” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 2016. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/41313/1/WEELY SEPTIA ANGGER HANDAYANI-FSH.pdf.

Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2017. https://.

Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia; Kementerian Agama Republik. “Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Buku I – Perkawinan; Buku II – Kewarisan; Buku III – Wakaf).” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia; Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, 1991. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/hukum/kompilasi-hukum-islam.

Indonesia, Republik. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama.” Jakarta: Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia, 1989. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/46804/uu-no-7-tahun-1989.

Kurniyawati, Tety. “Gugatan Cerai Berdasar Alasan Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Dalam Rumah Tangga Telah Ditolak Pengadilan Agama Karena Tidak Terbukti (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jember Nomor: 2901/Pdt.G/2005/PA.Jr.).” Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, 2008. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/17922.

Rais, Isnawati. “Tingginya Angka Cerai Gugat (Khulu’) Di Indonesia: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusi Mengatasinya.” Al-’Adalah 12, no. 1 (2014): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v12i1.183.

Ramadhita, R. “Gender Inequality and Judicial Discretion in Muslims Divorce of Indonesia.” [Tidak Disebutkan Nama Jurnal – Jika Tersedia, Tambahkan Di Sini], 2023. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/14373/1/Gender inequality and judicial discretion in Muslims divorce of Indonesia.pdf.

Pengadilan Agama Watampone. Putusan Nomor 10/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Wtp tentang Cerai Gugat. 2022.

Sanusi, Sanusi, Rifqi Qiwiyul Iman, Reza Baihaki, and Ibnu Farhan Syarif Hidayatullah. “Judges’ Ijtihad on Women’s Rights after Divorce and Its Contribution to Family Law Reform in Indonesia.” SMART: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity 3, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v3i1.16981.

Shoarian, Ebrahim, and Mahsa Jafari. “Good Faith Principle in Contract Law: A Comparative Study under Sharī͑ah, Islamic Law Jurisdictions with Emphasis on Iranian Law.” Arab Law Quarterly, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10089.

———. “Good Faith Principle in Contract Law: A Comparative Study under Sharī͑ah, Islamic Law Jurisdictions with Emphasis on Iranian Law.” Arab Law Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2023): 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10089.

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Afifah. HS, N., muljan, M., Arnita Sari, D., & Febriany, A. V. (2025). HUBUNGAN SEKSUAL SUAMI ISTRI SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAH MURSALAH. AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 7(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v7i2.10659

Citation Check